Book Review: 1774: The Long Year of Revolution by Mary Beth Norton

1774: The Long Year of Revolution by Mary Beth Norton
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

It is a fifteen-month period in the history of North American that changed it forever, during that time British colonists went from being dominated by moderates to dividing to the extremes with bloody consequences. 1774: The Long Year of Revolution by Mary Beth Norton covers the period from December 1773 to April 1775 in which colonists separated into Whigs and Tories, aka Loyalists.

Over the course of 344 of text, Norton shows the reactions to a tax on tea and Parliament giving the East India Company direct access to colonial market which led to the final crisis between the colonies and Britain as well a break amongst the patriot colonists themselves when congresses and committees begin to be formed. As a longtime researcher of American Loyalists and Women, respectfully, during the Revolutionary era, Norton brings those elements as well as those well known to general history readers to give great context to this time in Colonial American history that doesn’t get a real in-depth look in histories that cover the period between 1763-1789 given everything that happened. Norton not only deals with what is happening in America, but real times events in Britain—as well as Europe as the year progresses—to show how events happening simultaneously or in reaction to previous events come at the point when debate or discussions have moved on thus showing how this crisis spiraled until bloodshed was inevitable. Overall, this book shows how the events of April 1775 became inevitable when just a year before they were unimaginable.

1774 is an insightful, in-depth history for general history readers as well as those interested in specialized. Mary Beth Norton is an accomplished historian that is well-written and very thorough in her research giving the reader confidence in what they read.

View all my reviews

Book Review: A New Age Now Begins (Volume One) by Page Smith

A New Age Now Begins: A People's History of the American Revolution, Vol. 1 by Page Smith
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The American Revolution began long before 1775, in fact the British colonists were technically rebelling in 1765 however during that decade the ‘American’ consciousness began. A New Age Now Begins: A People’s History of the American Revolution (Volume One) is the first of two books by Page Smith covering American Revolution as well as his American history series, A People’s History, in which he reveals how British colonists transformed into Americans.

Smith just doesn’t deal with the American Revolution with the immediate lead up but goes into the origins of each of the 13 colonies and their development in broad terms both internally but in relation to each other before 1763. The period between 1763 to the outbreak of armed conflict in 1775 covers a little over a third of the book as the British Parliament and colonists butted heads over taxes that brought the once selfish colonies closer together and the populace went from thinking of themselves as British to something new, Americans. The military phase of the Revolution takes up just under half of the rest of the volume and through just after the Trenton-Princeton campaign, but with several political developments like how the new states developed constitutions that would have implications later. This volume ends at page 872—with Volume Two continuing the page count—throughout which is a lot of information, but one of critiques I had was that there were no footnotes or bibliography until I glanced at Volume Two in which Page addressed the lack of footnotes—extending the length of an already large history, finding them personally pretentious, and including the sources within the text when quoting or revealing what an individual thought—and while an answer to my main critique, there is still a little doubt that affects my overall view of this very interesting history.

A New Age Now Begins (Volume One) is the first of a double volume history of the American Revolution with this dealing with the founding of colonies through the darkest hour of a young nation.

View all my reviews

Book Review: Midnight's Children by Salman Rushdie

Midnight's Children by Salman Rushdie
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

His life is an allegory for the post-colonial history of his homeland, but is it real? is he insane? is he suffering from PTSD? Yes. Midnight’s Children by Salman Rushdie follows the life of man born at the exact moment that India became an independent nation-state and how his life reflected that of the nation.

Rushdie writes the book from the perspective of its protagonist, Saleem Sinai, whose origins are as muddled as that of the nation itself at the time of independence. Throughout the book, the magical elements of Saleem’s familial—hereditary attributes and emotional pollution—and personal life are related by the character himself but instead of simply not mentioning the illogicalness of this Saleem addresses these magical connections directly at several points. As I said above Saleem’s life mirrors that of India’s from its independence in 1947 through the 1980s even though he himself doesn’t stay in India the entire time—living in Pakistan almost a decade until the Bangladesh Independence War of 1971—but that doesn’t stop their connection. Unlike Isabel Allende’s The House of the Spirits, this magical realism novel kept me engaged throughout whether because Rushdie’s actual references to historical events compared to Allende’s allusions to Chilean history thus getting to the history addict in me or simply me liking Rushdie’s writing style over Allende’s. Not only was this Rushdie’s first novel, but it was also my first exposure to his writing, and it makes me interested in others of his work.

Midnight’s Children is an engaging read of how not only a nation, but individuals related to the end of the British Raj and an independent nations early history handled the chan

View all my reviews